Home » Can Tech Help Sustain Our Planet? – BBC Click technology bbc

Can Tech Help Sustain Our Planet? – BBC Click technology bbc

by Langsongshipin123



Click is in Arizona finding out how ‘artificial trees’ are being developed to suck carbon out of the air. Plus, drones that follow ships to ‘sniff’ emissions.

Subscribe HERE
Find us online at www.bbc.com/click
Twitter: @bbcclick
Facebook: www.facebook.com/BBCClick .

Images related to the topic technology bbc

Can Tech Help Sustain Our Planet? – BBC Click

Search related to the topic Can Tech Help Sustain Our Planet? – BBC Click

#Tech #Sustain #Planet #BBC #Click
Can Tech Help Sustain Our Planet? – BBC Click
technology bbc
See all the latest ways to make money online: See more here
See all the latest ways to make money online: See more here

See also  Top 10 Most Valuable Tech Companies (2021) technology company

Related Posts

26 comments

Joshua milton onyango 13/09/2021 - 3:53 PM

this is what bulls heet looks like

Reply
Safe Harbor Boys Home 13/09/2021 - 3:53 PM

That did not gain traction because politicians don’t want to stop global warming they needed to push their agendas and to get us to give up our freedom scientist knows a couple of volcanoes going off in the problem fixes it self man is foolish to think that he can destroy something God has me read the Bible

Reply
Guy Netzer 13/09/2021 - 3:53 PM

by getting rid of humans

Reply
shadow eagle 13/09/2021 - 3:53 PM

That's not going to help the ice age is going to happen no matter what you do it's happened before in the dinosaur era and Minnie times before you're just trying to make more money haha😁😁😁😂😂😂😜

Reply
Seeker 13/09/2021 - 3:53 PM

It's not scalable and the cost is. Very prohibitive. Trillions, preserving our wild forests jungle and planting trees must be a major part of the solution . But we've got to stop polluting.

Reply
Jerry Gundecker 13/09/2021 - 3:53 PM

Covering the Mideast in rock containing CO2 doesn't sound like a bad idea.

Reply
Pete Logan 13/09/2021 - 3:53 PM

Trees…plant billions of REAL trees instead.

Reply
Darryl Washington 13/09/2021 - 3:53 PM

This is a good idea but stupid as the same time because why catch C.O.2. In the machine Then make things to put iback inside are body to kill us slowly an make us sick” 🤮an only thing you need to do is melted the C.O.2.in the dirt ground at the Desert 👀 then it won’t be inside are immune system👍

Reply
Dan Campbell 13/09/2021 - 3:53 PM

Yawn, more doomsday cult propaganda, when the Elite start selling their Seafront Mansions, instead of buying them like the Obamas 15 Million Dollar Mansion then you should listen.

Reply
Daniel Mount 13/09/2021 - 3:53 PM

With all of the forest fires and cutting down all of our rain forests, you will be killing all of the human life in the future. The Broude leaf Trees are the main trees that clean's the air and creates Oxigen.

Reply
Jeremy Travis 13/09/2021 - 3:53 PM

The real issue is that humans require energy and that produces heat. Humans demand for heat is the real issue. 
I don't understand why they don't use the same principals they use to produce carbon particles for Co2. 
Is it not a case of making bucky balls from carbon dioxide.

Reply
This is awesome 13/09/2021 - 3:53 PM

More bullshit climate crap. Yet another money making piece of shit! FFS just plant millions of real trees! Then you will have no CO2 waste to deal with. Replacing the millions of trees we have cleared worldwide will do more for "global warming" than any other thing being talked about!

Reply
Sage Channel 13/09/2021 - 3:53 PM

It's so upsetting to see the guy at 15:00….
Let me rephrase that, it's so upsetting that we don't have a solution for people like the bloke at 15:00. Lab grown limbs, or synthetic ones, or… Something I can't even think of, a solution for him, and those like him, should exist in 2019!

Reply
Mariano Bascuñana 13/09/2021 - 3:53 PM

This channel need subtitles… please. thanks.

Reply
sabbracadabra 13/09/2021 - 3:53 PM

I was taught about global warming and CO2 emissions when I was at school in the 1980s… We have known the science for a long time, the problem is that nothing gets done because the world is run by corporations and self serving politicians. And the BBC are part of that.

Reply
Candis Brendel 13/09/2021 - 3:53 PM

EASIER T JUST GROW TREES!! CO2 IS WHAT MAKES PLANTS GREEN AND TREES GROW HOW STUPID ARE YOU PEOPLE!!??

Reply
Timothy Rarick 13/09/2021 - 3:53 PM

Great show as always, very interesting reporting. However, in the talk of climate change and what we need to do, I never see much reporting on what is going on in South America, India, Russia, and China. Would it be possible to focus on the non-European or North American efforts to tackle this crisis? We're all in this boat together.

Reply
RickOShay 13/09/2021 - 3:53 PM

There is now irrefutable proof that wireless technology specifically cell phone technology is directly impacting global insect populations.

All insects and most birds rely on the earth's magnetic field for navigation.

The 75% collapse in global insect biomass over the past two decades is the single biggest existential threat to mankind since the nuclear age.

Apart from wireless devices (cell phone towers and cell phones and other wireless Internet broadcast devices) interfering with insect navigation there is now significant proof that insect population decline is related to the build up of electromagnetic radiation in most airborne species.

The increase in the frequency spectrum usage and exponential growth of the wireless industry and device usage correlates directly to sudden and dramatic worldwide population decline.

The impact of insecticides has been factored into these studies and insecticides have been found to have had a relatively linear effect on population decline. Insecticides are therefore not the root cause of population collapse.

Insects play a critical role in the life process of the planet.

Time to rethink the ever increasing use of wireless technology.

Reply
Phil S 13/09/2021 - 3:53 PM

goofs

Reply
Luciano Salt 13/09/2021 - 3:53 PM

Or plant a tree!

Reply
gavisbeech 13/09/2021 - 3:53 PM

I think this CO2 machine is a con it uses electricity this 78 percent of the world still use fossil fuel to produce

it produces a waste product undrinkable carbonated water

and the report didn't state how much CO2 it takes to make it ( all in all a poor report)
whereas tree's no need for electricity

the waste product is wood you know the stuff you make boats, houses, furniture out of

Reply
Jimmy Porter 13/09/2021 - 3:53 PM

It makes far more sense to plant real trees than "artificial trees". The scientist who prefers his technology says trees need more space. But that's fine. We've got lots of space. Take a look at Russia, the biggest country in the world, and yet the vast majority of it is completely uninhabited and mostly grassland. It could be forested. At the same time, we should be bringing trees back into urban environments, mixed in and amongst the buildings.

The alternative of filling these spaces with "artificial trees" is both far more expensive, and far less desirable.

Reply
Robi Flego 13/09/2021 - 3:53 PM

they are artifical TREES, why do we need those? cant we plant more trees and renev the forests, it also reduces the head soaking of earth and sea… because trees use the suns energy insted of pointing it in another direction… and you can cut trees down and use them, what do you do with these? are they usable infinatly? i dont get why we need artificial trees cant we just plant trees and have forests ??? or is there not enough money in that?

Reply
hglenn55 13/09/2021 - 3:53 PM

Do a story on ships dumping their black water tanks before they arrive in port to lower cost. When they arrive in port they have to pay to have those tanks pumped. But they're not stupid. If they totally dump they know they will be fined so they dump a majority of it which means a lower rate they have to pay to the deposal company. Shipping is vital to the world but the way they go about it is worse than most other pollution aspects. Where do y'all think those floating plastis islands come from? Not most of us. When's the last time you threw something away in the ocean? I bet almost never.

Reply
fuckfannyfiddlefart 13/09/2021 - 3:53 PM

Click is responsible for creating more consumer junk than most media, so it's only appellate that they do some greenwashing nonsense!

Reply
H G E 13/09/2021 - 3:53 PM

fucking hell its obvious just re-green the Sahara it's feasible and it has been proven that there is enough space to capture all the carbon needed

Reply

Leave a Comment